In the case where the aggriving is very proportionate it is somewhat easy.
In the case where it is not proportionate you would probably be willing to do it for the symmetric part and not do it for the “remainder part”. If the remainder part is greater than the symmetric part you are more angry than peaceable.
One can take the most inconvenient case, you step on the toes of a unconvicted murderer. With one logic your faults, even minor don’t have anything to do the faults of others, you should apologise for stepping on peoples shoes. On the other hand, “there is kicking to be done” and apologising for stepping on toes and then chopping their head off would seem like 1 step forward and 100 steps back. Why not just go 98 steps backwards?
In the case where the aggriving is very proportionate it is somewhat easy.
In the case where it is not proportionate you would probably be willing to do it for the symmetric part and not do it for the “remainder part”. If the remainder part is greater than the symmetric part you are more angry than peaceable.
One can take the most inconvenient case, you step on the toes of a unconvicted murderer. With one logic your faults, even minor don’t have anything to do the faults of others, you should apologise for stepping on peoples shoes. On the other hand, “there is kicking to be done” and apologising for stepping on toes and then chopping their head off would seem like 1 step forward and 100 steps back. Why not just go 98 steps backwards?