I suspect that many dimensions of bias are highly corollated, including the dimensions of history and politics. This would seriously weaken the premise.
More importantly, do you have a model that distinguishes believability from accuracy, and values them separately? What led you to analyze the former rather than the latter?
I suspect that many dimensions of bias are highly corollated, including the dimensions of history and politics. This would seriously weaken the premise.
More importantly, do you have a model that distinguishes believability from accuracy, and values them separately? What led you to analyze the former rather than the latter?