Interesting, but Twitter? The actual source is this. (For anyone too lazy to click on a link, that’s a graphic from the UNHCR illustrating refugee arrivals in Europe.)
But this, also from the UNHCR, says about equal numbers male and female are fleeing Syria for neighbouring countries. The numbers are also equal after division by age group.
So, taking all of these numbers at face value, it appears that 4 million refugees have gone to nearby states, and a further 9% of that number have gone to Europe (excluding Turkey). Among those going to Europe, 75% are adult men. What do we know of them?
The main difference between going to Turkey and going to Greece is that going to Greece requires paying people smugglers a few thousand dollars. A lot of families can’t afford sending all family members to Europe, therefore they send only one, possibly as an anchor, later to be joined by other family members through family reunification programs.
Twitter was a much better choice than the original source. It isolated the particular claim but included a citation. Also, it did not require javascript.
Interesting, but Twitter? The actual source is this. (For anyone too lazy to click on a link, that’s a graphic from the UNHCR illustrating refugee arrivals in Europe.)
But this, also from the UNHCR, says about equal numbers male and female are fleeing Syria for neighbouring countries. The numbers are also equal after division by age group.
So, taking all of these numbers at face value, it appears that 4 million refugees have gone to nearby states, and a further 9% of that number have gone to Europe (excluding Turkey). Among those going to Europe, 75% are adult men. What do we know of them?
The main difference between going to Turkey and going to Greece is that going to Greece requires paying people smugglers a few thousand dollars. A lot of families can’t afford sending all family members to Europe, therefore they send only one, possibly as an anchor, later to be joined by other family members through family reunification programs.
Twitter was a much better choice than the original source. It isolated the particular claim but included a citation. Also, it did not require javascript.
Twitter is made of stupid.