No, Tamsin’s interpretation is correct.
Natural language is prone to ambiguous interpretations, and I’d tried to rephrase the summary a few times to avoid them. Didn’t spot that one.
Okay, mea culpa. You can state the policy clearly like this:”Suppose that, if you hadn’t been told X by someone who thinks X is exfohazardous, then you wouldn’t have known X before time t. Then you are obligated to not tell anyone X before time t.”
No, Tamsin’s interpretation is correct.
Natural language is prone to ambiguous interpretations, and I’d tried to rephrase the summary a few times to avoid them. Didn’t spot that one.
Okay, mea culpa. You can state the policy clearly like this:
”Suppose that, if you hadn’t been told X by someone who thinks X is exfohazardous, then you wouldn’t have known X before time t. Then you are obligated to not tell anyone X before time t.”