Meta point: footnotes went wrong.
(see: references 49-54, footnotes 28 then 75 displayed at the right, hovering the latter glitches even worse)
It might be better to restructure text so that it does not have an entire third of it in footnotes, perhaps?
Yeah there are definitely a lot of footnotes—the post was originally a lot longer but I ended up focusing in on the galactic-scale stuff.
I think it’s okay that they don’t quite line up—it’s clear what’s happened and people can still access that extra info if they want to read it.
Meta point: footnotes went wrong.
(see: references 49-54, footnotes 28 then 75 displayed at the right, hovering the latter glitches even worse)
It might be better to restructure text so that it does not have an entire third of it in footnotes, perhaps?
Yeah there are definitely a lot of footnotes—the post was originally a lot longer but I ended up focusing in on the galactic-scale stuff.
I think it’s okay that they don’t quite line up—it’s clear what’s happened and people can still access that extra info if they want to read it.