The version of Ben’s argument I’d make is “put some effort into the top-line of your review to somehow summarize either what your overall takeaways were, or, summarize why someone might want to read your review in full.”
(We could leave the compression to the Machines but I don’t think they’d do that good a job yet. It is plausible they could do a good enough job next year, but, I also kinda think LW should err on the side of not outsourcing that sort of thing.)
The version of Ben’s argument I’d make is “put some effort into the top-line of your review to somehow summarize either what your overall takeaways were, or, summarize why someone might want to read your review in full.”
(We could leave the compression to the Machines but I don’t think they’d do that good a job yet. It is plausible they could do a good enough job next year, but, I also kinda think LW should err on the side of not outsourcing that sort of thing.)