Wikipedia is considered trustworthy → people with strong agenda get to positions where they can abuse Wikipedia → Wikipedia is considered untrustworthy → people with strong agenda find better use of their time and stop abusing Wikipedia, people who care about correct information fix it → Wikipedia is considered trustworthy...
The agenda is mainly to follow the institutions like the New York Times. In a time where the New York Times isn’t worth much more then saw dust, that’s not a strategy to get to truth.
Could it be a natural cycle?
Wikipedia is considered trustworthy → people with strong agenda get to positions where they can abuse Wikipedia → Wikipedia is considered untrustworthy → people with strong agenda find better use of their time and stop abusing Wikipedia, people who care about correct information fix it → Wikipedia is considered trustworthy...
The agenda is mainly to follow the institutions like the New York Times. In a time where the New York Times isn’t worth much more then saw dust, that’s not a strategy to get to truth.