You can try reduce philosophy to science, but how can you justify the scientific method itself? By the fact that it works, where works defined as getting goals reached?
You can try reduce philosophy to science, but how can you justify the scientific method itself?
By the fact that it works, where works defined as getting goals reached?
By the same account appeal to the stick would be okay if it got you what you wanted. Yet violence seems epistemologically very suspect.
By the same account appeal to the stick would be okay if it got you what you wanted. Yet violence seems epistemologically very suspect.