How does it answer any of the points? Just seems like a sci-fi keyword soup of unreasonable conjunctions. Is there a tl;dr version of your reply to Kaj’s simple point?
not too seriously
Like a madman who throws Firebrands, arrows and death,
So is the man who deceives his neighbor,
And says, “Was I not joking?”
-- Proverbs
ETA: the last part of the comment only made sense with the original version of the story. If you did not see it please ignore.
A second thought on your proverb. I only thought about not using his name after I posted it. That was probably a dumb idea, I haven’t thought about the implications. But I didn’t intent any ad hominem. I’ll change the name now.
It shows that for every, in my opinion, unlikely scenario I can come up with an antiprediction, although it might not appear less unlikely to you it does reduce the overall probability of the outcome. I am also not aware of any points that I haven’t tackled in previous comments.
Just seems like a sci-fi keyword soup of unreasonable conjunctions.
Why shouldn’t an outsider say the same about AI going FOOM?
It shows that for every, in my opinion, unlikely scenario I can come up with an antiprediction
What about the likely scenario where a new-born AI naturally ane easily takes over all computational resources? I do not see how you are answering that with stories of Kaj finding himself in an interplanetary simulation.
AI going FOOM but don’t want to anger people too much. Although that didn’t quite work in your case it seems.
No, what did not work in my case is that you made it personal, and pretended you did not, as I think I pointed out.
No, what did not work in my case is that you made it personal, and pretended you did not, as I think I pointed out.
I am sorry, I replaced the name with my real name. I’m really not neurotypical when it comes to such interactions. I can only assure you of my honesty here. I didn’t mean to insult him by using his name in the story. I haven’t thought about that at all.
How does it answer any of the points? Just seems like a sci-fi keyword soup of unreasonable conjunctions. Is there a tl;dr version of your reply to Kaj’s simple point?
Like a madman who throws Firebrands, arrows and death,
So is the man who deceives his neighbor,
And says, “Was I not joking?”
-- Proverbs
ETA: the last part of the comment only made sense with the original version of the story. If you did not see it please ignore.
A second thought on your proverb. I only thought about not using his name after I posted it. That was probably a dumb idea, I haven’t thought about the implications. But I didn’t intent any ad hominem. I’ll change the name now.
It shows that for every, in my opinion, unlikely scenario I can come up with an antiprediction, although it might not appear less unlikely to you it does reduce the overall probability of the outcome. I am also not aware of any points that I haven’t tackled in previous comments.
Why shouldn’t an outsider say the same about AI going FOOM?
What about the likely scenario where a new-born AI naturally ane easily takes over all computational resources? I do not see how you are answering that with stories of Kaj finding himself in an interplanetary simulation.
No, what did not work in my case is that you made it personal, and pretended you did not, as I think I pointed out.
I am sorry, I replaced the name with my real name. I’m really not neurotypical when it comes to such interactions. I can only assure you of my honesty here. I didn’t mean to insult him by using his name in the story. I haven’t thought about that at all.