Thank you for your answer, very appreciated indeed.
Before starting to write my post I have indeed read the basics about what has very little chance to pass the LessWrong moderation (thank you for pointing these again to me) and I think my post does not fall into the same patterns as these examples. My post is AI safety related and basically explains one dialogue technique/pattern to derail a LLM into making a lot of “controversial statements”. So this post contains a lot of user-LLM interactions with explaining notes. It also contains lot of “controversial statements” (for demonstration purpose).
Thank you for offering me to read my draft, etc… that would be helpful in terms of making a better guess about if my post has a reasonable chance to pass moderation but that would add some complexity to my workflow and would not really offer much guarantee the LessWrong moderation team would accept my post (or would it?!).
I really would like to have a proper discussion with the LessWrong moderation team, this is what I really need and really would like to have. Thank you StanislavKrym for replying to me as it actually helped me clarify what I need and how I want to handle that problem: I just need to talk to the moderation team about my post and so I will just wait for them to answer me. It is annoying, disappointing and frustrating that they state that usually reply under 3 hours but haven’t done so for 30 hours and counting. But what can I do about that? I suspect not much so I will just wait (I mean I will do other things of course while waiting!).
Thank you again for your answer and your help, very appreciated indeed.
Thank you for your answer, very appreciated indeed.
Before starting to write my post I have indeed read the basics about what has very little chance to pass the LessWrong moderation (thank you for pointing these again to me) and I think my post does not fall into the same patterns as these examples. My post is AI safety related and basically explains one dialogue technique/pattern to derail a LLM into making a lot of “controversial statements”. So this post contains a lot of user-LLM interactions with explaining notes. It also contains lot of “controversial statements” (for demonstration purpose).
Thank you for offering me to read my draft, etc… that would be helpful in terms of making a better guess about if my post has a reasonable chance to pass moderation but that would add some complexity to my workflow and would not really offer much guarantee the LessWrong moderation team would accept my post (or would it?!).
I really would like to have a proper discussion with the LessWrong moderation team, this is what I really need and really would like to have. Thank you StanislavKrym for replying to me as it actually helped me clarify what I need and how I want to handle that problem: I just need to talk to the moderation team about my post and so I will just wait for them to answer me. It is annoying, disappointing and frustrating that they state that usually reply under 3 hours but haven’t done so for 30 hours and counting. But what can I do about that? I suspect not much so I will just wait (I mean I will do other things of course while waiting!).
Thank you again for your answer and your help, very appreciated indeed.