I think it’s okay for people to bet against it; we’re going to have a large betting norm within the house. If nobody bet against, I wouldn’t have anybody to bet with!
Exit plans are now #1 on the “to finalize” list, and have had multiple eyes on. I strongly endorse the way that LW has focused me toward that part of things, which I was underweighting. However, I also note that some people SHOULD ultimately still be dissatisfied with the exit norms, and therefore choose not to participate. Like, that’s part of the definition of high-stakes, high-commitment—it’s not for everybody, and in fact if everybody were on board with the exit norms being sufficient it … wouldn’t be much of anything?
The key, in my opinion, is being clear clear clear clear clear, and that particular part of it was not clear enough to the potential participants, and it will be now.
Thanks again for your willingness to write things up.
I think it’s okay for people to bet against it; we’re going to have a large betting norm within the house. If nobody bet against, I wouldn’t have anybody to bet with!
Exit plans are now #1 on the “to finalize” list, and have had multiple eyes on. I strongly endorse the way that LW has focused me toward that part of things, which I was underweighting. However, I also note that some people SHOULD ultimately still be dissatisfied with the exit norms, and therefore choose not to participate. Like, that’s part of the definition of high-stakes, high-commitment—it’s not for everybody, and in fact if everybody were on board with the exit norms being sufficient it … wouldn’t be much of anything?
The key, in my opinion, is being clear clear clear clear clear, and that particular part of it was not clear enough to the potential participants, and it will be now.
Thanks again for your willingness to write things up.