Wait a minute, that is a non-epistemic justification for a propositional claim. You normatively should build huge safety margins into your bridges, but it’s still erroneous to falsely overestimate the risk of a bridge collapse, even if that belief motivates the engineer to work harder.
I agree. If I had paid more attention to the discussion, I might have realized that in this case “paranoia” was strictly in reference to probability estimates and not in reference to emotions or resource allocation. Sorry everybody.
Wait a minute, that is a non-epistemic justification for a propositional claim. You normatively should build huge safety margins into your bridges, but it’s still erroneous to falsely overestimate the risk of a bridge collapse, even if that belief motivates the engineer to work harder.
I agree. If I had paid more attention to the discussion, I might have realized that in this case “paranoia” was strictly in reference to probability estimates and not in reference to emotions or resource allocation. Sorry everybody.