Field ho­mo­mor­phism is triv­ial or injective

WikiLast edit: 31 Dec 2016 14:23 UTC by Patrick Stevens

Let and be fields, and let be a field_homomorphism. Then one of the following is the case:

Proof

Let be non-constant. We need to show that is injective; equivalently, for any pair of elements with , we need to show that .

Suppose . Then we have ; so because is a field homomorphism and so respects the “subtraction” operation. Hence in fact it is enough to show the following sub-result:

Suppose is non-constant. If , then .

Once we have done this, we simply let .

Proof of sub-result

Suppose but that is not , so we may find its multiplicative inverse .

Then ; but is a homomorphism, so , and so .

But this contradicts that the image of the identity under a group homomorphism is the identity, because we may consider to be a group homomorphism between the multiplicative groups and , whereupon is the identity of , and is the identity of .

Our assumption on was that , so the contradiction means that if then . This proves the sub-result and hence the main theorem.

No comments.