A group homomorphism is a function between groups which “respects the group structure”.
Definition
Formally, given two groups and (which hereafter we will abbreviate as and respectively), a group homomorphism from to is a function from the underlying set to the underlying set , such that for all .
Examples
For any group , there is a group homomorphism , given by for all . This homomorphism is always bijective.
For any group , there is a (unique) group homomorphism into the group with one element and the only possible group operation . This homomorphism is given by for all . This homomorphism is usually not injective: it is injective if and only if is the group with one element. (Uniqueness is guaranteed because there is only one function, let alone group homomorphism, from any set to a set with one element.)
For any group , there is a (unique) group homomorphism from the group with one element into , given by , the identity of . This homomorphism is usually not surjective: it is surjective if and only if is the group with one element. (Uniqueness is guaranteed this time by the property proved below that the identity gets mapped to the identity.)
For any group , there is a bijective group homomorphism to another group given by taking inverses: . The group is defined to have underlying set equal to that of , and group operation .
For any pair of groups , there is a homomorphism between and given by .
There is only one homomorphism between the group with two elements and the group with three elements; it is given by . For example, the function given by is not a group homomorphism, because if it were, then , which is not true. (We have used that the identity gets mapped to the identity.)
I have a question about general Arbital practice here. A mathematician will probably already know what a group homomorphism is, but they probably also don’t need the proofs of the Properties, for instance, and they don’t need the explanation of the trivial group. Should I have split this up into different lenses in some way?
so8res: “I would set up the page as follows:
A group homomorphism is X. Key properties of group homomorphisms include:
1. Thing. Implications implications implications. (Proof.)
2. Thing. Implications implications. (Proof.)
…
I’d then eventually add an intro lens.”
Having proofs on child pages makes sense to me too.