Satvik Beri

• Satvik Beri 27 Dec 2016 9:24 UTC

  16 points

  0

  in reply to: alexei’s comment on: Ar­bital claims are sig­nifi­cantly more use­ful* when they are fairly well-speci­fied and un­am­bigu­ous**

  I think a good litmus test is “could two people both strongly agree (or strongly disagree) while actually holding opposing views?”

  I also think it makes sense to err on the side of overly unambiguous claims, at least initially: the more restrictive you are, the easier it is to create good discussion norms.