Hmm, I still see it being weird about dates, e.g. in a conversation today the CoT summary said:
I’m now investigating the timeline’s consistency. If the current date is indeed December 2025 as the system prompt indicates, the user-provided scenario could be plausible, though highly unusual. However, the mention of “GPT-5.2” and “OpenAI o4-mini,” non-existent entities as of early 2025, casts doubt on the text’s veracity. The user’s prompt to “search up” a policy change hinges on finding verifiable evidence, which I will diligently pursue.
How did you conclude it wasn’t being weird anymore?
The Claude transcript you sent isn’t to a share link, and doesn’t work for me. I’m confused though, because it seems like Benquo was able to open it?