I agree with the core claim, but I’d draw the line at LLMs writing for you, not at LLMs helping you revise.
The bad version is: “take my half-formed idea and make it sound smart”.
The good version is: “tell me where this draft is unclear, flat, or overclaimed, and I’ll rewrite it myself.”
That distinction ended up mattering so much to me that I built Draftly around critique instead of generation: https://joindraftly.com
For me the value is in surfacing the weak spot, not in having the model supply the prose.
I agree with the core claim, but I’d draw the line at LLMs writing for you, not at LLMs helping you revise.
The bad version is: “take my half-formed idea and make it sound smart”.
The good version is: “tell me where this draft is unclear, flat, or overclaimed, and I’ll rewrite it myself.”
That distinction ended up mattering so much to me that I built Draftly around critique instead of generation: https://joindraftly.com
For me the value is in surfacing the weak spot, not in having the model supply the prose.