My post was intended seriously (well, parts of it are obviously a joke) and I didn’t put much effort into making it sound like lsusr, as the rules explicitly said I could post anyway. Besides, since I am lsusr I don’t need to imitate myself.
The serious parts of my post are serious, anyway.
AI analysis got moderated away unfortunately. Chatgpt gave it a 8.5/10 style consistency and very high conceptual alignment (in Soviet Russia, AI align you!) It says my contest viability is strong, even without changes (I made none of the suggested changes, one of which was to leave a section without a conclusion because apparently lsusr (aka me) is known to do that.) It also said I was too clear. Weird.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/zfWEkJxbraymvqtjS/meditations-on-suffering-1
AI says this is highly similar to lsusr, analysis in reply
The argument works more generally. You not being a chicken is evidence that chickens don’t have qualia, even without a simulation. Perhaps I should have included this argument in my post last year as, given the sheer number of shrimp, it’s strong evidence against shrimp sentience.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/zfWEkJxbraymvqtjS/meditations-on-suffering-1