If you want a system that is both fast and dynamic and also takes care to account for all interests from all stakeholder groups, not just shareholders
Then the obvious idea to me seems to be a “forecastocracy” rule by the best forecasters. The best person at forecasting all stakeholders’ interests is most capable of taking them into account while being a dynamic decision-maker.
It shouldn’t be too hard to implement. Just hold a score voting election every X years where all stakeholders score a set of candidates for forecastocratic governance, but also appended to that vote they predict what the final score for each candidate will, then rather than a standard score voting election where each vote has equal weight, each vote would be weighted by its predictive accuracy.
You could do futarchy and have the prediction markets in charge, but that seems like it’d lack the dynamism required, and has the difficulty getting traders on the market.
If you want a system that is both fast and dynamic and also takes care to account for all interests from all stakeholder groups, not just shareholders
Then the obvious idea to me seems to be a “forecastocracy” rule by the best forecasters. The best person at forecasting all stakeholders’ interests is most capable of taking them into account while being a dynamic decision-maker.
It shouldn’t be too hard to implement. Just hold a score voting election every X years where all stakeholders score a set of candidates for forecastocratic governance, but also appended to that vote they predict what the final score for each candidate will, then rather than a standard score voting election where each vote has equal weight, each vote would be weighted by its predictive accuracy.
You could do futarchy and have the prediction markets in charge, but that seems like it’d lack the dynamism required, and has the difficulty getting traders on the market.