What I find interesting here is that this piece makes a potentially empirically falsifiable claim: That the lack of a good personality leads to consistency deficiencies in LLMs. So if you took a base model and trained it on an existing real person (assuming one could get enough data for this purpose) it ought to show less of the LLM weirdness that is described later on.
Surely someone has already tried this, right? After all nostalgebraist themselves is well known for their autoresponder bot on Tumblr.
This is true if “wanting to maintain a libertarian approach” is already a goal but wouldn’t it be better epistemics to investigate the cause monopolists market position without the already fixed opinion that it will be due to government intervention? Having that as a strong prior is fine of course but not something you “want” to be true.