Okay, so can you operationalize the distinction between the levels? Or offer an idea as to why the other levels would masquerade as fact-level exchanges? Plausible deniability?
And is ‘rationalist’ a good term for the behavioral pattern you’re writing about, seeing how it tends to get associated with the contrasting notion of empiricism (at least in my mind)?
Damn, looks like an interesting book! Is it entertainingly written? (Looking for a belated mother’s day gift.)