I just started reading OB, so I am not sure if I am a rationalist by this blog’s definition. However, I do try to be think about my decisions and pick the rational choice.
I grew up in an accepting Christian family where discussion was encouraged, instead of being indoctrinated into a religion with little room to question.
I have now evolved into believing in the idea of good and of trying to do good. In my mind God= good, therefore I believe in God. This idea fits into several religions. In context of Christianity, the main point of dissent is Jesus. However, I believe in the idea that we are not perfect and can be more good than we are now. This is the idea behind redemption, and the idea behind Jesus.
I share these beliefs with those who ask my opinion on religion, but I don’t participate in these types of discussions with extended family because I want to love them in the short amount of time I spend with them, not create conflict.
In your own family, however, you can create a safe environment to question anything and everything. Discussions like these can refine ideas and the ability to communicate ideas. Both of these things are valueable for all parties involved.
@ Michael G.R.
I have OB on my regular RSS reader, and I consider myself a fairly spiritual person.
One can have religion and still think deeply—the thought provoking discussions and posts are intellectual fodder for both atheists, agnostics and religius people.
Why is overcoming bias equivalent with being atheist or agnostic?