The author says that although the usual and most grand conception of AGI is not here, it is meaningful and useful to go ahead and say that AGI is here. He does not explain why it is useful to say that; he just says it. He also says that the latest models meet criteria 1-3, but does not give supporting examples. Without these elaborations, this audaciously-titled post is another one of many found around the web lately that boil down to: “I have been using the latest models a heck of a lot lately, and I am blown away/scared.”
EverythingExceptReason
Karma: 9
I appreciate your replies, Gordon, and your saying (or implying) that this post does indeed boil down to vibes (“feeling the AGI hard”) and not some unassailable pronouncement. Given that, I do wonder, like Rafael, if the bombastic title “AGI is Here” is overstated and will lead many to undue anxiety. (Or due anxiety, but not actionable anxiety.)
I understand that since you believe full-strength AGI is near at hand, you believe it is meaningful and useful to overstate the present state of things a bit. So I wonder: what are people to do about this? Of course the whole society is grasping for the answer to this, and we cannot know it. Since you have been in this space for a long time (and I am not in it at all) I’d be curious to hear your thoughts in a later post.
You say your audience is other techies who are deep in this stuff, in agentic AI. I guess your message to them is something like, “Make sure you skill up so you are not left behind like all novice programmers certainly will be.”
What would you advise non-techies (including former techies, like me) who are cautiously wowed by LLMs but are not especially worried about AGI to do with the alarm that you believe you rightly sound? I do not study AI safety or pay attention to the ongoing speculations about AGI, whatever that concept means. I do not frequent this site. I only made an account and commented here because a good friend who does frequent the site (and, like me, does not use agentic tools) sent me this post with an implied oh shit.
If non-specialists (my friend and I) are not the audience you want to engage, my apologies, and feel free to ignore my post. And I am sorry if my original post was not too productive. It’s just that this week there was a lot of fear pervading the waters of the web. I’m trying to understand why, and I had hoped, given the title of this post, to find something more than that someone deep in this stuff is experiencing anxieties that “most people [in his audience] can simply see for themselves.” In that case, I wonder why such a post is needed, other than for the audience to feel less alone: “Hey, I guess I’m not the only one with this deep worry.”