Interesting. Now I’m thinking about my own journey.
Having been raised Christian… and in a very evangelical, pentecostal tradition no less… I wasn’t exactly encouraged to think like this early on… great swathes of things were simply to be taken on faith, and doubt simply referred over to the appropriately doctrinal section of apologetics. It did not help that both of my parents hold bachelor’s degrees in Christian theology.
Nonetheless… they couldn’t entirely shield me from the world. The start of my journey, so far as I can recall, came while studying physics… which I did before high school, incidentally, as I was always a voracious reader. I read about things like Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, and Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle… and after thinking about the implications of them, I realized that I was confused.
“Hang on, this can’t be right. God is omniscient, and thus has knowledge of everything, everywhere in the universe, irregardless of such pettiness as the speed of light being the maximum speed for transfer of information. The tools of Science may not be able to determine both the exact position and momentum of a particle, but God must know!”
Of course, my initial reaction was wrong. But I’d spotted a problem in my worldview, and additional study of science seemed to reinforce my nagging doubts. I didn’t have a word to explain it, then… indeed, I didn’t have the words to fully articulate the problem until I read Atlas Shrugged in college, and thereby learned of the law of non-contradiction. But it was seeing that contradiction that first got me thinking in terms of “either my religious beliefs are true, or a large body of experimentally verified science is true, but not both”… and having realized that, it left me open to changing my mind on the subject later on. Which, fortunately, I did.
Yeah...
No.
Firstly, you are not a wizard. Unless perhaps you’re engaging in useless definitional sophistry to pretend that wizard means something aside from common usage or some such nonsense, in order to fruitlessly pretend that you know what you’re talking about.
Secondly, you are explicitly inventing a nonsense explanation to explain a nonsense phenomenon. As well say that the match doesn’t light in the magical world because magical energies destroy phlogiston.