Course titles are fixed so I didn’t choose that, but because it’s a non-intro course it’s up to the instructor to decide the course’s focus. And yes, the students had seen the description before selecting it.
Eleni Angelou
Karma: 168
I designed an AI safety course (for a philosophy department)
Confusions and updates on STEM AI
AI Alignment in The New Yorker
A Study of AI Science Models
A Guide to Forecasting AI Science Capabilities
On taking AI risk seriously
Everything’s normal until it’s not
Yup, that’s what I mean. Specifically, I had Pinker in mind: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/3nL7Ak43gmCYEFz9P/cognitive-science-and-failed-ai-forecasts
It was intro to phil 101 at Queens College CUNY. I was also confused by this.
Questions about AI that bother me
[Question] Should AI writers be prohibited in education?
Progress and research disruptiveness
AI Safety Camp: Machine Learning for Scientific Discovery
Thank you Lawrence!
Here’s a famous book on this: https://www.amazon.com/Rise-Robots-Technology-Threat-Jobless/dp/0465097537