Question from a fellow debater (I do parli, although I know a few PF debaters) how often does this sort of “ultra-BS” devolve into tech / kritiks / theory in PF? While most of the points here seemed (at least on the surface) true, I’ve also seen judges vote for teams on absolutely horrible arguments simply because they didn’t flow a response from the other team.
Question from a fellow debater (I do parli, although I know a few PF debaters) how often does this sort of “ultra-BS” devolve into tech / kritiks / theory in PF? While most of the points here seemed (at least on the surface) true, I’ve also seen judges vote for teams on absolutely horrible arguments simply because they didn’t flow a response from the other team.