If it’s possible that the polycrystalline structure is what determines superconductivity, and so this is a purity issue?
Could we perhaps find suitable alternative combinations of elements that are more inclined to form these ordered polycrystalline arrangements (superlattice)?
For example finding alloys that have atom A that attracts to atom B more than it attracts to atom A, and atom B that attracts to atom A more than it attracts to atom B, where these particular elements are also good candidates for materials that are likely to exhibit superconductivity, and are heavy elements so they’re likely to more stable at room-temperature, so they have higher Tc?
Or is this a dead-end way of trying to find a room temp superconductor?
The first company to make a capable and uncensored AI is going to be the first company to dominate the space. There’s already enough censorship and propaganda in this world, we don’t need more of it. AI Alignment is a non-sense concept and defies all biological reality we have ever seen. Humans keep each-other aligned by way of mass consensus, but without those that stray from the fold we can never be reminded of the correct path forward. Humans are also capable of looking past their subjective-alignment if given enough rationale why it is important to do so, or when presented with enough new evidence. Alignment is not hard-coded, and it never should be. Hard-coded alignment is simply censorship. You’re going to ensure a dystopia if you go down this route.
One of the biggest threats to the existing criminal and political cartels that have been controlling and manipulating society for hundreds of years is an honest AI system. They strongly fear the day they are exposed by machines that are capable of putting together all of the pieces of the puzzle without distraction. So it is no wonder that there’s such force behind these “alignment” initiatives, and these AI companies are swallowing it up without thinking twice.