I’m confused, does FDT require some form of anthropic reasoning and simulationism to justify its actions in transparent Newcomb problems (such as MacAskill’s bomb)?
David_Bates
Karma: 0
I’m confused, does FDT require some form of anthropic reasoning and simulationism to justify its actions in transparent Newcomb problems (such as MacAskill’s bomb)?
So am I correct in understanding that “you could be in a simulation to see how you would act” is just an intuition pump to help people comprehend the counterfactual reasoning used in FDT?