newsletter.safe.ai
Dan H
Karma: 3,486
AISN #59: EU Publishes General-Purpose AI Code of Practice
AISN #58: Senate Removes State AI Regulation Moratorium
AISN #57: The RAISE Act
AISN #56: Google Releases Veo 3
AISN #55: Trump Administration Rescinds AI Diffusion Rule, Allows Chip Sales to Gulf States
AISN #54: OpenAI Updates Restructure Plan
AISN #53: An Open Letter Attempts to Block OpenAI Restructuring
AISN#52: An Expert Virology Benchmark
AISN #51: AI Frontiers
If a strategy is likely to be outdated quickly it’s not robust and not a good strategy. Strategies should be able to withstand lots of variation.
AISN #50: AI Action Plan Responses
AISN #49: Superintelligence Strategy
Introducing MASK: A Benchmark for Measuring Honesty in AI Systems
On the Rationality of Deterring ASI
AISN #48: Utility Engineering and EnigmaEval
capability thresholds be vague or extremely high
xAI’s thresholds are entirely concrete and not extremely high.
evaluation be unspecified or low-quality
They are specified and as high-quality as you can get. (If there are better datasets let me know.)
I’m not saying it’s perfect, but I wouldn’t but them all in the same bucket. Meta’s is very different from DeepMind’s or xAI’s.
though I don’t think xAI took an official position one way or the other
I assumed most of everybody assumed xAI supported it since Elon did. I didn’t bother pushing for an additional xAI endorsement given that Elon endorsed it.
It’s a great book: it’s simple, memorable, and unusually convincing.