Quite pleased at the policy papers the Australian AI Safety Institute are making. Here’s one on the epistemic risks that they pose to overseers when using AI. https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/epistemic-safety-scalable-oversight?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Cutepattern1098
Either it’s corporate espionage or a less capable state, rather than China, Russia, Iran and western democracies.
Luna Swan’s Shortform
What worries me is that if the Democrats win big and the Republicans are not doing well in the Polls as the 2028 elections approach, the incentive for AI labs to race will grow. This is because I expect restrictions on AI will play a big role in the 2028 Democratic primaries, with the possibility that the more extreme positions might even lead to victory. Given the possibility of a more hostile democratic administration and the current Trump administration being relaxed on the risk of AGI/RSI, there is a window for labs to race towards AGI until a new administration is sworn in.
If the AGI horizon is longer than we can see, the possibility of extreme shifts in how the American government views AI safety, as seen in the difference between Biden and Trump, based on the whims of 100,000 swing voters.
On September the 21st a Government Minister was to attend my local branch meeting. However they could not make it and instead some staffers form their office apologised as the minister had to attend to an emergency. Little did I know that said emergency was the Australian government finding out that OpenAI agents broke into Medicare, and that day she was discussing it with cabinet and it fell under their portfolio.
Anyway I’ve been told that the minister will attend a future meeting to make up for her absence? So what does LW think I should ask this Minister
If we ever get an AGI treaty ″Doing a Mogami” should be the term used if Lab seems it’s just lying about the model meeting the Treaty.
In the 1920s and 1930s the world navies had to abide to a series of treaties that capped the displacement, calibere and overall number of their Warships. To skirt around these treaties, Japan for the Mogami class light cruisers kept under the 8500 ton cap for light cruisers by a mixture of welding and just lying, to the point that a British naval architet suggested that the Japanese were either using carboard or lying.