I proposed an edit to fix these 2 issues (in the 1st example):
1) The answer claims there is no anti-symmetry, which is mistaken. In particular, if something breaks anti-symmetry, it cannot be a valid strict ordering (which is another claim from the answer).
2) This is less serious, but saying “everyone must follow orders that come from the CEO” in natural language is unclear on whether the CEO follows orders from himself.
I proposed an edit to fix these 2 issues (in the 1st example):
1) The answer claims there is no anti-symmetry, which is mistaken. In particular, if something breaks anti-symmetry, it cannot be a valid strict ordering (which is another claim from the answer).
2) This is less serious, but saying “everyone must follow orders that come from the CEO” in natural language is unclear on whether the CEO follows orders from himself.