I am very curious how you think about this post in retrospect: parts of it seem clearly falsified. I completely understand if you currently feel bound by a non-disparagement clause and expect it to be a few weeks before that can be confirmed to no longer apply.
Celer
Karma: 333
Monthly Shorts 1/22
Four Scenarios of Job-Reducing AI
Declining Marginal Costs of Alienation
There’s Room in the Manger
Water Above the Ocean
Three years later, I mostly stand by this: war with China has not happened, but estimates of likelihoods have risen, and it not driven by food concerns in the slightest.
6/23
5/23
Monthly Shorts 8/21
Monthly Shorts 4/23
Monthly Shorts 3/23
Monthly Shorts 1&2/23
How do you expect journalism to work? The author is trying to contribute one specific story, in detail. Readers have other experiences to compare and draw from. If this was an academic piece, I might be more sympathetic.
Correction: the Youtube link should point to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpwSNiLV-nw, not the current location (a previous video of yours).
I wish I knew! Nobody has yet explained it to me, nor do I have any theories I am particularly confident in.
https://x.com/JacobHHilton/status/1794090561294467074
He has also explicitly told people not to expect candor from him on this issue until the situation changes. That the binding is no longer part of a contract, as opposed to implicit threat, seems of little relevance.