I search for good explanations in an age of thinking machines. 25 years building software: low-code platforms before popular, AI strategy before it was on every roadmap. Now focused on what intelligence abundance actually means for work, value, and coordination. Frameworks: Technohumanism, Outcome Economy, Cyclic Rationality. Writings at github.com/buwilliams/buddy-williams-writings.
BuddyIterate
Karma: 0
Insightful. Glad you wrote it.
I enjoyed the combination of “these are real costs” and “positive impact is worth the cost.”
I found this insightful, ”...reflect a superior attitude...give...advice or criticism...signaling...they have...these positive traits”
I think the challenge lies in categorizing people as “superior” and “average”. I like the use of labels since it helps the conversation, but I wonder if it is too limiting. Perhaps, context and topic are important dimensions worthy of consideration as well. I can imagine real people responding differently given more variables, such as context and topic.
Bottom line: I loved it!