Reality is that which is weirder than you think it is. If you agree with this, I have some questions:
Why are we curious about reality?
How well do we understand rehabilitation? A good example would be gait reestablishment after a stroke.
How does procedural memory produce cognition? Not in terms of theory, but in terms of steps.
How do some people think better than others? How does learning from context work?
How do we decide when we are using tooling vs thinking, cognizant of our recognition?
Why does mesa optimization work at all, if variation in an experiment is an illusion and regression to the mean assumes permanence in a changing world? Why can’t science give the same meaning to reality as stories like religion or politics do?
Why are WE curious about reality?
I’ve always read the Gödel citizenship anecdote less as “this topic is dangerous” and more as “formal systems have edge cases, please don’t bring them up at awkward social moments.”
That mostly works, until it doesn’t. Which is true of basically everything humans make up, including citizenship hearings. But wouldn’t life be so boring if we couldn’t gamble?