And again, you don’t need to offer a large % of all future resources if the AI has DMR in resources. (I agree it’s a lot harder to credibly offer a large fraction of the stars.)
Yeah, agreed. (That’s why I specified “resource hungry” in my original message.)
Makes sense. Though flagging this is then a dimension on which humans can realistically get potentially better placed than AIs. They can rely more on legal institutions as well as trying to engineer situations with joint bargaining power. (Though again, perhaps you’ll say AIs will be more willing than humans to actually engineer those situations, which does seem right to me.)
Yeah. Also, I think it’d be hard to engineer significant joint bargaining power (not reliant on anyone’s good intentions) without having some government on board.
Difficult for a few individuals to give AI legal rights that humans are unlikely to reverse.
Difficult for a few individuals to give AI weapons that would let them impose big costs on humans in the future.
Though if the AIs have big DMR then maybe they’re happy with a big bitcoin wallet or something.
Yeah, agreed. (That’s why I specified “resource hungry” in my original message.)
Yeah. Also, I think it’d be hard to engineer significant joint bargaining power (not reliant on anyone’s good intentions) without having some government on board.
Difficult for a few individuals to give AI legal rights that humans are unlikely to reverse.
Difficult for a few individuals to give AI weapons that would let them impose big costs on humans in the future.
Though if the AIs have big DMR then maybe they’re happy with a big bitcoin wallet or something.