Create incentives to catch misconduct seems the simplest solution
That effectiveness of this solution depends, in particular on what other incentives are there.
Imagine a poor crime-ridden neighbourhood where police put up “Rat on your neighbours—we pay for tips!” posters. That’s “incentives to catch misconduct”, but even if you collect the tip you still have to live in the neighbourhood and I expect that being a known snitch carries a heavy price.
...is regarded by those within the fields in such a manner?
By some, certainly. I expect the prevalence to vary depending on the field. In, say, physics, not so much, but in things like gender studies, close to 100%.
For example, you won’t be invited as a co-author for papers. People will exclude your from research groups. Reviewers will be nasty to your submissions.
That effectiveness of this solution depends, in particular on what other incentives are there.
Imagine a poor crime-ridden neighbourhood where police put up “Rat on your neighbours—we pay for tips!” posters. That’s “incentives to catch misconduct”, but even if you collect the tip you still have to live in the neighbourhood and I expect that being a known snitch carries a heavy price.
Do you think objectivity and willingness to challenge ideas in science is regarded by those within the fields in such a manner?
I mean, it wouldn’t surprise me, but if it’s gotten that far, I think the problem may have gotten beyond a simple remedy.
By some, certainly. I expect the prevalence to vary depending on the field. In, say, physics, not so much, but in things like gender studies, close to 100%.
Duh… X-/
I don’t see how this point carries over to the problem at hand.… what’s the heavy price for the scientist snitch?
For example, you won’t be invited as a co-author for papers. People will exclude your from research groups. Reviewers will be nasty to your submissions.
The bigger problem with that, is that the police will be flooded with false tips.