Also certain types of “unacceptable” speech could be banned by the site. This would stimulate out-of-the-box discussion and brainstorming.
By which mechanism do you expect to improve discussion by introducing censorship?
I’m completely opposed to any type of censorship whatsoever, but this site might have two restrictions:
Descriptions of disruptive or dangerous new technology that might threaten mankind
Politically or socially controversial speech considered beyond the pale by the majority of members or administrators
By which mechanism do you expect to improve discussion by introducing censorship?
I’m completely opposed to any type of censorship whatsoever, but this site might have two restrictions:
Descriptions of disruptive or dangerous new technology that might threaten mankind
Politically or socially controversial speech considered beyond the pale by the majority of members or administrators