On Copenhagen Interpretation of Ethics grounds I precommitted to not responding to queries like this, or else it would look like anyone who tried to solve any problem had an obligation to consider every related problem.
My intuition is that “the smart shot“ (whatever that is) plus a neural lace in an exponentially expanding number of people looks very similar to an RSI, except that a datacenter is unneeded, the nodes of the ASI have human rights, and it will never actually happen because it requires human experimentation, which would be banned.
Obvious followup to this: would you be interesting/willing to work on human cognitive enhancement? If not, why?
On Copenhagen Interpretation of Ethics grounds I precommitted to not responding to queries like this, or else it would look like anyone who tried to solve any problem had an obligation to consider every related problem.
Fair enough. I guess I want to get a sense of how hopeless an endeavor what I’ve proposed above is.
My intuition is that “the smart shot“ (whatever that is) plus a neural lace in an exponentially expanding number of people looks very similar to an RSI, except that a datacenter is unneeded, the nodes of the ASI have human rights, and it will never actually happen because it requires human experimentation, which would be banned.