Which is fortunate because 17 increases by 10% would give us a total increase of just over 5x, but 10.5 increases by 10% give us a 2.7x increase, or (as in the article) a tripling if we’re generous.
Either the two mistakes cancel each other out, or there’s a typo, or some clever math trick I’m not aware of.
Which is fortunate because 17 increases by 10% would give us a total increase of just over 5x, but 10.5 increases by 10% give us a 2.7x increase, or (as in the article) a tripling if we’re generous.
Either the two mistakes cancel each other out, or there’s a typo, or some clever math trick I’m not aware of.