I don’t understand why I’m expected to find the “scientist”s arguments convincing.
More specifically, he assumes that the digits are close enough to evenly distributed, and I don’t see why they should be.
I’m very uncertain, entertaining both hypotheses of “I’ve missed something obvious” and “the example is wrong”; could someone please help me with an explanation.
I don’t understand why I’m expected to find the “scientist”s arguments convincing.
More specifically, he assumes that the digits are close enough to evenly distributed, and I don’t see why they should be.
I’m very uncertain, entertaining both hypotheses of “I’ve missed something obvious” and “the example is wrong”; could someone please help me with an explanation.