You can get pretty similar graphs by just assuming that hiring slowly increased up to 2021 and then slowly decreased. The demographic bulge from the hiring spike moves up in age over time, and normalizing to 2022 hides the fact the overall ratio of hires at different ages hasn’t changed at all.
Very good, yes was thinking in the same direction but knowing too little about absolute hiring numbers/cohorts etc. ended up not adding that point even though you’re right, it is a rather clear addition to our argument of the graph in OP being easily overrated.
You can get pretty similar graphs by just assuming that hiring slowly increased up to 2021 and then slowly decreased. The demographic bulge from the hiring spike moves up in age over time, and normalizing to 2022 hides the fact the overall ratio of hires at different ages hasn’t changed at all.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1z0l0rNebCTVWLk77_7HAwVzL7QtTjlrllAMH2lxhnes/edit?usp=sharing
Very good, yes was thinking in the same direction but knowing too little about absolute hiring numbers/cohorts etc. ended up not adding that point even though you’re right, it is a rather clear addition to our argument of the graph in OP being easily overrated.