I believe that all friendly decision making agents should view utility for your opponent as utility for you too in order for the agent to actually be friendly.
A friendly agent, in my opinion, should be willing to accept doing poorly in the prisoner’s dilemma if it allows your opponent to do better.
I also believe that an effective decision making agent should have an inclination to avoid waste.
This does not exclude understanding exploitability, fairness, negotiation techniques and attempts at penalty induced behavior modification of other agents towards solutions on the pareto boundary.
These points do not (directly) contribute to resolving issues of truly selfish cooperative agents and as such are missing the point of the post.
I believe that all friendly decision making agents should view utility for your opponent as utility for you too in order for the agent to actually be friendly.
A friendly agent, in my opinion, should be willing to accept doing poorly in the prisoner’s dilemma if it allows your opponent to do better.
I also believe that an effective decision making agent should have an inclination to avoid waste.
This does not exclude understanding exploitability, fairness, negotiation techniques and attempts at penalty induced behavior modification of other agents towards solutions on the pareto boundary.
These points do not (directly) contribute to resolving issues of truly selfish cooperative agents and as such are missing the point of the post.