Although I don’t use the term “eugenecist” because of its negative social connotations, I consider myself a proponent of eugenics.
I want to vote your article up twice, once for being interesting and thought provoking, and once for being careful to use terms like “hardly anyone would identify emself” rather than “no-one would identify emself”. One of the things I like about the Less Wrong community is its devotion to accuracy.
Although I don’t use the term “eugenecist” because of its negative social connotations, I consider myself a proponent of eugenics.
I want to vote your article up twice, once for being interesting and thought provoking, and once for being careful to use terms like “hardly anyone would identify emself” rather than “no-one would identify emself”. One of the things I like about the Less Wrong community is its devotion to accuracy.