The heuristics I’m interested in for that section aren’t heuristics that are merely efficient, but heuristics that sacrifice accuracy for computational cheapness.
Ok, I see what you mean. Sounds like the difference between a bad bias and a good bias is whether the person realizes they’re sacrificing accuracy, and is consistent in dealing with the consequences of that.
Or maybe a better way to put it is: bad biases lose accuracy, good biases only lose precision.
Ok, I see what you mean. Sounds like the difference between a bad bias and a good bias is whether the person realizes they’re sacrificing accuracy, and is consistent in dealing with the consequences of that.
Or maybe a better way to put it is: bad biases lose accuracy, good biases only lose precision.
That is a beautiful way to put it.