Flagging that the conclusion (with the double tricolas) and some of the main text reads as LLMy to me. I don’t think all of it is: the conceptual density of relevant ideas in this post is too high and also some of the syntactical choices are odd in a way that specifically points to French-language origin, however the text reads as non-trivially LLMy in a way that seems unlikely to be explained by someone writing the full thing first and then a single light copy-editing pass with an LLM.
Sadly, you flag as AI generated one of the part of the post untouched by AI.
But, yes, I did use Claude as a sparring partner, and iterated on style for a bit, and not just for light copy editing. All the arguments came from a reaction of mine in French.
Flagging that the conclusion (with the double tricolas) and some of the main text reads as LLMy to me. I don’t think all of it is: the conceptual density of relevant ideas in this post is too high and also some of the syntactical choices are odd in a way that specifically points to French-language origin, however the text reads as non-trivially LLMy in a way that seems unlikely to be explained by someone writing the full thing first and then a single light copy-editing pass with an LLM.
(Note that Pangram flags this as 100% Human)
Sadly, you flag as AI generated one of the part of the post untouched by AI.
But, yes, I did use Claude as a sparring partner, and iterated on style for a bit, and not just for light copy editing. All the arguments came from a reaction of mine in French.
Thanks so much, appreciate the response and the correction!