If the implication doesn’t hold, can you name an agent that has successfully acted to deviate from the ought while maintaining its agency? Otherwise it seems likely to me the implication does hold. As for the rest being flawed, I’m trying to compress a few years of thought into a few paragraphs meant to be legible to more or less anyone for sake of looking for discussion partners. Citing Korsgaard, or going into depth on transcendental or constitutive arguments would defeat the purpose.
If the implication doesn’t hold, can you name an agent that has successfully acted to deviate from the ought while maintaining its agency? Otherwise it seems likely to me the implication does hold. As for the rest being flawed, I’m trying to compress a few years of thought into a few paragraphs meant to be legible to more or less anyone for sake of looking for discussion partners. Citing Korsgaard, or going into depth on transcendental or constitutive arguments would defeat the purpose.