The correct response is to acknowledge the downside but argue that the upsides outweigh it.
Arguably, a better response (depending on the “goal” of the “debate”) would be to demonstrate confidence in the upsides and their superior worth in a manner which connotatively implies that the downside is far overshadowed. That’s somewhat Dark-Side-flavored, though.
Arguably, a better response (depending on the “goal” of the “debate”) would be to demonstrate confidence in the upsides and their superior worth in a manner which connotatively implies that the downside is far overshadowed. That’s somewhat Dark-Side-flavored, though.