The other large part of my disagreement is that I’m not sure if that reduction of patriarchy is worth stopping evolutionary psychology, which seems very useful.
So you think that the usefullness of evolutionary psychology is worth, say, human trafficking?
If that’s the case, our utility functions are too different to really have a conversation about the relative value of different political acts.
Don’t be a jerk. You’re misconstruing my position. Human trafficking is very big and very bad. I was discussing a small reduction in patriarchy. If you think that evolutionary psychology is somehow the lynchpin of human trafficking, fine, but then please present a rational argument for that conclusion instead of sneaking it in under the table. You discredit your viewpoint further when you turn to disingenuous tactics to support its supposed validity. You also piss me off.
So you think that the usefullness of evolutionary psychology is worth, say, human trafficking?
If that’s the case, our utility functions are too different to really have a conversation about the relative value of different political acts.
Don’t be a jerk. You’re misconstruing my position. Human trafficking is very big and very bad. I was discussing a small reduction in patriarchy. If you think that evolutionary psychology is somehow the lynchpin of human trafficking, fine, but then please present a rational argument for that conclusion instead of sneaking it in under the table. You discredit your viewpoint further when you turn to disingenuous tactics to support its supposed validity. You also piss me off.