“It doesn’t” is a decidedly possible interpretation of the data. It’s called the Many Worlds Interpretation, and is the interpretation advocated by the Less Wrong sequence on QM. Have you read that sequence?
No. I’ve been thrown off by the terminology “many worlds” and nonsense I’ve heard elsewhere (see below). Hope to give the sequence a fair shot soon.
“It doesn’t” is a decidedly possible interpretation of the data. It’s called the Many Worlds Interpretation, and is the interpretation advocated by the Less Wrong sequence on QM. Have you read that sequence?
No. I’ve been thrown off by the terminology “many worlds” and nonsense I’ve heard elsewhere (see below). Hope to give the sequence a fair shot soon.