Would be interesting to see if these results hold up in a more adversarial setting. In both cross-platform matching and matching split accounts, the users are not actively trying to remain anonymous, and would be less averse to sharing identifiable information.
I would argue that if de-anonymization is possible, it’s better if a white-hat researcher does it first, a-la responsible disclosure.
Would be interesting to see if these results hold up in a more adversarial setting. In both cross-platform matching and matching split accounts, the users are not actively trying to remain anonymous, and would be less averse to sharing identifiable information.
I would argue that if de-anonymization is possible, it’s better if a white-hat researcher does it first, a-la responsible disclosure.
I think the real world test on anthropic interviews is the closest to a proper test. The interviews were redacted when anthropic released it.